Proponents of hiking the minimum wage have been gaining momentum in recent years, and $15/hour is already happening in some cities like Seattle. The economics arguments for and against are well-known. Proponents argue that raising the minimum wage is a matter of basic fairness and survival for those at the bottom of the economic ladder. Opponents argue that minimum wages in general, and especially one that spikes higher suddenly, create market distortions that cause job losses and reduced job opportunities. Nothing new there. Both sides seem to have merit.
Not to take sides here, but there is more to the argument against minimum wage laws than just job losses. Okay, so maybe I am taking a side. Personally, I tend toward libertarian thoughts, especially when it comes to economics. I do not begrudge anyone earning a fair rate of pay for the work they perform. I have raised three daughters, two of whom are still college students and working in relatively low-paying hourly jobs that pay roughly the minimum wage or very close to it. Would I want my daughters to work for less than their current pay rate if it were legal to do so? Not especially, but if the alternative were for them have no job at all, forcing them to extend their dependence on me… Uh uh.
The current push for $15/hour wages nationally raises several concerns… for one thing, it’s inflationary. The Wall Street Journal published an article this morning which described the tensions created by “wage compression” which occurs when those at the bottom are suddenly thrust ahead on the pay scale and begin earning nearly the same as those who have much more experience and seniority. Now the employer is faced with some unhappy experienced workers who become less motivated to perform. The employer may feel obligated to elevate their pay as well to maintain equity in the workplace. All of this leads to some tough choices… eliminate some positions or raise prices or both in order to cover the added payroll costs. Inflation ensues.
And what about insurance? Workers compensation premiums are based on payroll, and workers compensation benefits are based on wage rates. Higher minimum wages leads to increased premiums and increased benefit costs. Inflation. And then there is Obamacare. How will those folks feel about smaller tax credit subsidies to help pay for their mandatory Obamacare insurance policy once their higher income kicks in (assuming they still have a job)?
When all is said and done, and the political winds calm down, we will likely see a new national minimum wage that could be as high as $15/hour. The earth will continue to rotate and the stars, moon, and sun will still be in the sky. But I have to wonder… if $15/hour is going to be so great for the American working class and our national economy overall, then why stop there? Why not $20 or $25 or even $50 per hour? If $15/hour is great then a $50/hour minimum wage should end poverty and hardship forever. No, you say? $50, $25, $20 are arbitrary and ridiculously high pay rates.
So is $15 for entry-level jobs that were never intended to be a career.